全球主机交流论坛

标题: 为什么官方的速度没有DAIGOU快啊？？ [打印本页]
作者: joojoo    时间: 2009-12-17 20:21
标题: 为什么官方的速度没有DAIGOU快啊？？
什么原因啊，难道是传说中的龙服务器


fremont1.linode.com

inging host27.linode.com [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:
eply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=55
eply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=55
eply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=55
eply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=270ms TTL=55

ing statistics for 64.71.152.17:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
pproximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 268ms, Maximum = 272ms, Average = 270ms




www.hostloc.com

[74.207.247.162] with 32 bytes of da
.162: bytes=32 time=205ms TTL=55
.162: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=55
.162: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=55
.162: bytes=32 time=204ms TTL=55

4.207.247.162:
, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
作者: shinko    时间: 2009-12-17 20:32
又不一定是同一个机房的.......
作者: RyoKazami    时间: 2009-12-17 20:39
难道是专用测试机……
作者: omegabomb    时间: 2009-12-17 20:43
daigou速度感觉好bt
作者: cpuer    时间: 2009-12-17 21:12
各地不一样的

Pinging 64.71.152.17 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 178ms, Maximum = 181ms, Average = 179ms
作者: 宋兵乙    时间: 2009-12-17 21:36
Ping位置：香港（203.85.0.249）  
Pinging 64.71.152.17 [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=52
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=52
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=52
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 <0% loss>,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 160ms, Maximum = 165ms, Average = 162ms
HK:Ping completed

Ping位置：美国（204.13.65.152）  
Pinging 64.71.152.17 [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=55
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=55
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=55
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=55

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 <0% loss>,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 2ms, Maximum = 2ms, Average = 2ms
USA:Ping completed

Ping位置：英国（78.129.169.164）  
Pinging 64.71.152.17 [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=52
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=52
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=149ms TTL=52
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 <0% loss>,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 147ms, Maximum = 150ms, Average = 148ms
UK:Ping completed

Ping位置：黑龙江网通（218.8.241.218）  
Pinging 64.71.152.17 [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=252ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=247ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=235ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=237ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 <0% loss>,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 235ms, Maximum = 252ms, Average = 242ms
HLJ:Ping completed

Ping位置：广东深圳电信（211.154.135.213）  
Pinging 64.71.152.17 [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=53
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 <0% loss>,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 161ms, Maximum = 163ms, Average = 162ms
GD:Ping completed

Ping位置：河北石家庄电信（219.148.37.1）  
Pinging 64.71.152.17 [64.71.152.17] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=54
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=202ms TTL=54
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=54
Reply from 64.71.152.17: bytes=32 time=201ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 64.71.152.17:
         Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 <0% loss>,
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
         Minimum = 201ms, Maximum = 202ms, Average = 201ms
HB:Ping completed

all Ping completed
||statTable||
Ping位置发送包(次)接收包(次)丢包最短响应时间(ms)最长响应时间(ms)平均响应时间(ms)
美国440 <0% loss>222
英国440 <0% loss>147150148
黑龙江网通440 <0% loss>235252242
广东深圳电信440 <0% loss>161163162
河北石家庄电信440 <0% loss>201202201
香港440 <0% loss>160165162
||statTable||
                                                                  
Ping位置发送包(次)接收包(次)丢包最短响应时间(ms)最长响应时间(ms)平均响应时间(ms)
美国440 <0% loss>222
英国440 <0% loss>147150148
黑龙江网通440 <0% loss>235252242
广东深圳电信440 <0% loss>161163162
河北石家庄电信440 <0% loss>201202201
香港440 <0% loss>160165162


[ 本帖最后由 Godaddy 于 2009-12-17 21:39 编辑 ]
作者: Dik    时间: 2009-12-17 21:56
楼上数据还精确...
作者: lenghost    时间: 2009-12-17 22:11
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: tos    时间: 2009-12-17 23:29
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: blueflame    时间: 2009-12-18 00:10
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: junhan    时间: 2009-12-18 00:15
Ping位置发送包(次)接收包(次)丢包最短响应时间(ms)最长响应时间(ms)平均响应时间(ms)
美国440 <0% loss>121412
黑龙江网通440 <0% loss>233234233
广东深圳电信440 <0% loss>168176170
河北石家庄电信440 <0% loss>205206205
香港440 <0% loss>158168163
英国440 <0% loss>145145145

这是我的，感觉不错`
作者: cpuer    时间: 2009-12-18 02:13
标题: 回复 12# 的帖子
哪家的VPS？



欢迎光临 全球主机交流论坛 (https://loc.193.gs/) Powered by Discuz! X3.4